Linking Development Finance with Results: A View from the Philippines

It is estimated that realizing the ambitious Sustainable Development Goals will cost in the trillions of dollars, requiring significant resources from multiple sources, and then mobilising and channeling these resources in new and efficient ways. Based on these new challenges, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA) called for governments to adopt Integrated National Financing Frameworks (INFFs) – long-term, ambitious plans that enable governments to link finance with results. The Development Finance Assessment (DFA), a tool designed to assist governments in creating INFFs, works by establishing a baseline in a country and then recommending prospective reforms. The Philippines’ National Economic and Development Authority conducted a development finance assessment, which served as an input in crafting its Ambisyon Natin 2040 (Our Ambition 2040), the country’s Long Term Vision document. Ambisyon 2040 sets the vision that “by 2040, the Philippines shall be a prosperous, predominantly middle-class society where no one is poor.”

The Philippines, a lower middle-income country, has rapidly expanded its economy. The services sector and industry have been key growth drivers, contributing to an average GDP growth of 6.2 percent during the last six years. Government spending, particularly on infrastructure, has likewise expanded. However, poverty and inequality remain a challenge. In order to address this, the government has tightened the link between planning, programming, budgeting and implementation through results-oriented public sector management reform. The Philippine Government conducted its Development Finance and Aid Assessment (DFAA) in 2014, which feeds into national development planning, strengthening of the fiscal framework and more transparent Public Financial Management (PFM) systems. The DFAA found that tax and non-tax revenues, a major source of development finance, increased substantially from 2000 to 2013. Also, consistent with the experience of other countries, Official Development Assistance (ODA) has gradually declined, relative to other sources. The DFAA report also provides a roadmap for policy reform, in this case recommending more effective domestic resource mobilisation, principally through more effective taxation and expenditure management. Critical findings like these help the government facilitate a more integrated management of multiple components of development finance towards achieving the national priorities set in the Philippine Development Plan (PDP), which incorporates the Sustainable Development Goals.

The Philippines is a proactive participant in the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation’s monitoring rounds, and the country’s results show impressive progress in implementing the effective development co-operation principles. The various country development strategies, partnership strategies and operational business plans with development partners demonstrate alignment of the Philippine Development Plan with the development objectives and priorities. Development projects in the Philippines also reveal strong alignment with country results frameworks, such as the Results Matrices, which embodies an indicator framework for measuring the outcomes outlined in the PDP. The Philippine Government consults with civil society organizations as well as the private sector in the design, implementation and monitoring of development policies, illustrating active regard for inclusive partnerships. Institutions such as the National Competitiveness Council (NCC) and the Open Government Partnership (OGP) enable these multi-stakeholder partnerships, which further enhance the quality and relevance of public-private dialogues around development finance and policy implementation. The recently held Philippine Development Forum (PDF) highlighted the multi-stakeholder participation and engagement by government in addressing development challenges and priorities.

By tracking the development funding’s annual predictability, the Global Partnership’s monitoring framework can help governments and providers engage in forward-looking dialogue. Predictability enables more accurate and comprehensive information, and ensures closer alignment of financing with country-specific targets. According to the results of this indicator, the Philippines’ annual and mid-term predictability are high (98 percent and 76 percent, respectively) with minimal fluctuation compared to 2013 data. Mutual accountability is also critical, and the Philippines creates a space for this through bilateral arrangements such as joint country partnership strategies. The government and development partners meet periodically at the PDF to discuss progress of major commitments, lessons learned and ways forward, while the annual ODA reviews mandated by congress allow transparency on the effective and efficient use of ODA.

By undertaking the DFA’s roadmap toward developing and strengthening the building blocks of its INFF, embracing the co-operation principles of the Global Partnership, and participating in monitoring progress, the Philippines has gained recognition of being a model in the region. Although certain areas need strengthening and capacities have to be further improved, a clear understanding of challenges and weak areas is indicative of a thriving DFA. This, however, is deemed to be a long-term process, beginning with assessment and followed by refinement of objectives. For the Philippines, national priorities going forward are three-fold: continuing to adopt a multi-stakeholder approach in national and regional development, exploring innovative financing (including risk transfer instruments that can build resilience against climate change vulnerabilities) and addressing issues on the use of country systems.

By remaining an engaged member of the Global Partnership, the Philippine Government will be able to keep these priorities at the fore, while helping to enable peers and partners to reach their own national goals. The Second High-Level Meeting (HLM2) at the end of last year highlighted for the region the need for coherence between the Global Partnership, the SDGs and the Financing for Development agendas. It served to outline concrete ways in which effective development co-operation principles can enhance countries’ ability to finance their national development plans. HLM2 also highlighted the importance of cross-country exchanges on approaches to leveraging finance for country-level development priorities. There is a need to scale up knowledge sharing on leveraging finance for sustainable development in time to meet our ambitions for 2030. With HLM2 behind us, the new year is an opportunity to assess progress, for the Philippines, the Asia-Pacific region and the world, as we as a community seek to reach national goals through global co-operation.

(Photo credit: NEDA)

Effective Development Co-operation Monitoring Workshop Summary Now Available

Monitoring effective development co-operation: what have we achieved; how can we do better?, a workshop at the margins of the Second High-Level Meeting (HLM2) of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation, took stock of progress in implementing the commitments for more effective development co-operation, mapping existing bottlenecks and discussing possible solutions.

Held on 29 November 2016 in Nairobi, Kenya, the workshop also assessed emerging challenges for development effectiveness and reflected on how to update the existing global monitoring framework in the context of the Addis Ababa Action Agenda and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Discussions drew on the findings from the 2016 Global Partnership Progress Report, online consultations, regional consultations and other preparatory events held ahead of HLM2. Its conclusions were reported during HLM2’s first plenary.

The monitoring workshop’s six sessions gave participants the opportunity to engage in critical dialogue around the following topics:

1. Overview of the 2016 monitoring round
2. Increasing the focus on development results
3. Strengthening country ownership
4. Creating inclusive partnerships for development
5. Improving transparency and accountability
6. Updating and refining the Global Partnership’s monitoring framework for the future

Click here to read the summary of the workshop.
Click here to read the workshop’s agenda (French, Spanish).

81 Monitoring Profiles Now Released

This week the last batch of 16 Monitoring Profiles were released, marking the successful conclusion of the Second Monitoring Round of the Global Partnership. Prepared by the UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team, the profiles complement the Making Development Co-operation More Effective: 2016 Progress Report. The 81 Monitoring Profiles (available here) will provide country and territory level evidence base for discussions at the High-Level Meeting (HLM2) of the Global Partnership on 28 November – 1 December.

Based on data collected from governments and development partners, public and private, each profile provides a snapshot of a country’s progress in achieving more effective development co-operation. It highlights specific country context and the monitoring results of indicators attached to effectiveness principles, alongside analysis, trends and policy recommendations.

Read the last batch of 16 profiles in English and French below:

  1. Afghanistan
  2. Kosovo1
  3. Mexico2
  4. Benin (FR)
  5. Burkina Faso (FR)
  6. Cameroon (FR)
  7. Central African Republic (FR)
  8. Chad (FR)
  9. Comoros (FR)
  10. Congo (FR)
  11. Côte d’Ivoire (FR)
  12. Gabon (FR)
  13. Guinea (FR)
  14. Mauritania (FR)
  15. Sao Tome and Principe (FR)
  16. Senegal (FR)

Click here to explore all 81 Monitoring Profiles.

To find out more about the Global Partnership monitoring framework, participating countries and organisations, monitoring data and how to participate, please click here.


All references to Kosovo on this website should be understood to be in the context of Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999).

The Mexico monitoring profile is based on an ad hoc report by Mexico that examines Mexico’s progress in implementing the effective development co-operation principles, especially as a dual country and in South-South Co-operation.